To explain this exhibition, it is best to leave it to the artist. Speaking in an interview with curator Sean McGlashan, which is published in a booklet accompanying the show, Currall says:
"I am performing when I make a work. I am performing in a way we all perform…We all have to continuously keep reconstructing a sense of who we are and what we do in order to give integrity to the myth of ourselves as a contiguous self."
While I think this is a fascinating area to explore, I didn’t feel that Currall always tackled the subject successfully. I really found this exhibition very hard work – even though I did try very hard to make sense of it all!
My frustrations were backed up by many of the people who wrote in the exhibition’s comments book, although some explained themselves more eloquently than others.
In his interview with McGlashan, Currall says, "I’ve knocked out quite a lot of stuff in the studio but …I’ve thrown so much away precisely because I was able to understand, explain and talk about them really well. It’s only work that still confuses me, which I still have trouble understanding, that interests me."
While this statement may suggest a subtext of hidden subtleties that cannot be explained in words, I’m sorry to say I did not always get his work.
I was left wondering, if the artist himself doesn’t understand all of his work, how can gallery visitors like myself be expected to make sense of it?